Few pieces of software are more universal than text editors. Many flame wars have been fought between groups insisting that their editor of choice is the paragon of editing perfection, and insulting the others. Most participants in these arguments recognize that it is (largely) tongue-in-cheek. There are related battles over operating systems, programming languages, and even source code indent style.
Editor wars are usually fought between the devotees of the two most popular editors on Unix-like systems: vi and emacs. The arguments usually focus on modern implementations of these two editors, the most popular of which are vim and GNU emacs. Most users of these systems are familiar with both programs to some extent, knowing them well enough to at least do some basic text editing, and therefore feel they are well-placed to make judgment calls as to which is "better". Both editors are extensive and extremely powerful tools, and have rather steep learning curves, so users invest a lot of time in getting to know the editor they use. This necessary time investment results in more opinionated users.
Differences between vi and EmacsEdit
Template:POV The most important differences between vi and Emacs are:
- vi editing retains each permutation of typed keys. This creates a path in the decision tree which unambiguously identifies any command.
- Emacs commands are a combination of typed keys executed immediately, which leaves the user with the choice of whether or not to use a command.
- vi is smaller and faster, and (traditionally at least) has limited customization capability.
- Emacs takes longer to start up and requires more memory. However, it is highly customizable and includes a large number of bells and whistles, as it is essentially a Lisp programming language execution environment which runs a Lisp program designed for text-editing.
- vi was traditionally used inside of a text-mode console, having no graphical user interface (GUI) (although vim has one).
- Whereas Emacs, while initially designed for use on a console, grew a GUI fairly early on. Modern versions of both provide various GUIs.
- The difference in feature set and startup time tends to influence the way that the editors are used: vi users tend to enter and exit the editor repeatedly, and use the Unix shell for complex tasks, whereas Emacs users usually remain within the editor and use Emacs itself for complex tasks. Both editors are now able to issue commands from the shell.
Benefits of vi-like editors Edit
- Follow a "Composition of simple tools" philosophy
- Small in size and keeps with the Unix philosophy "do one thing, and do it well". Avoid Featuritis
- Faster than Emacs (traditionally at least)
- Run in all systems that can implement the standard C library, including DOS,Windows, Mac, BeOS, and POSIX compliant systems
- Offer simplified movement on text (beginning|end of lines|word|paragraphs ...)
- Can compose commands with movement, e.g. 6dd deletes 6 lines
- Allow the user to keep fingers on home row thus requiring less movement to edit
Benefits of Emacs Edit
- "Everything at reach" philosophy.
- No mode switching ("insertion of text", "moving around and specifying commands") (see benefits of vi; uses metakey chords).
- Larger set of commands than vi.
- Support of non ASCII languages(Chinese, ...).
- Extensible and customizable (Lisp programming language variant - Emacs Lisp); list of some nice features:
- Early on, Emacs included a helpful screen explaining how to exit that was presented when the program started. At the time, vi did not provide such a hint, forcing many users who could not figure out how to exit to simply disconnect their terminals.
A 1984 interview with vi creator Bill Joy revealed that he himself used ed, which led Emacs proponents to the saying, "even Bill Joy doesn't use vi anymore."
The Church of Emacs, formed by Richard Stallman, is a joke, and while it refers to vi as the "editor of the beast" (vi-vi-vi being 6-6-6 in Roman numerals) , it does not oppose the use of vi; rather, it calls proprietary software an anathema. ("Using a free-software version of vi is not a sin; it is a penance.") It has its own newsgroup, alt.religion.emacs, that has posts purporting to support this parody religion.
Here is a typical post:
Truly, our responsibility to spread the Gospel of the Gnu is weighty. Cleave to what is good. Remember the words the prophet Stallman brought down from the Mount MIT, graved in Lisp on tablets of crystalline lambda calculus. Only this true: Emacs is pure. All else is false. Do not be misled by false gods like Vi, the Editor of the Beast. Do not be seduced by Word, the Scarlet Woman of Babylon. Do not be driven to madness by Xcode, the Blind Priest of the Children of Asherath. When the wild winds of chaos blow, stay pure. When the universe collapses in shards around you, stay holy. When the gibbering hobgoblins of apostate Editors attack with shards of broken syntax, seek the crystalline stillness within you. Brethren, ensure that you (Meta-x-say-hallel-to-Emacs) daily for otherwise you will be lost. When the Beast comes, only Emacs can save you. This was brought to you as a public service by the Holy and Ineffable Church of The Mighty Emacs. SUPPORT THIS CRUSADE WITH YOUR DONATIONS. EMAIL THE STILL BEATING HEART OF A VILE VI USER TO emacs-highpriest@god-hates-vi-users
vi supporters have created an opposing Cult of vi, argued by the more hardline Emacs users to be an attempt to "ape their betters".
Regarding vi's modal nature, some Emacs users joke that vi has two modes – "beep repeatedly" and "break everything". vi users enjoy joking that Emacs's key-sequences induce carpal tunnel syndrome, or mentioning one of many satirical expansions of the acronym EMACS, such as "Escape Meta Alt Control Shift" (a jab at Emacs's reliance on modifier keys). Others have posited that this acronym in fact means "Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping" (in a time when that was a great amount of memory) or "EMACS Makes Any Computer Slow" (a recursive acronym like those Stallman uses), in reference to Emacs's high system resource requirements. The more modern humorist uses "Eventually Mallocs All Core Storage" as his or her future-proof witticism. Those who have a particular beef with the GNU flavor of EMACS (perhaps an XEmacs fan) may propose "Generally Not Used, Except by Middle-Aged Computer Scientists" as the proper expansion.
As a poke at Emacs’ creeping featurism, vi advocates will describe Emacs as “a great operating system, lacking only a decent editor”.
There is some additional humor that pokes fun at vi at http://www.dina.kvl.dk/~abraham/religion/vi-tutorial.html, as well as Lisp (associated with Emacs) at the xkcd comic here, here, and here.
Current state of the editor warEdit
In the past, many small editors modeled after or derived from Emacs flourished. This was due to the importance of conserving memory with the comparatively minuscule amount available at the time. These days, with a plenitude of memory, many vi-alikes, Vim in particular, have grown in size and code complexity. These vi variants of today, as with the old light Emacs variants, tend to have many of the perceived benefits and drawbacks of the opposing side. Namely, recent versions of Vim can have more extensions and run slower than past versions of Emacs. Moreover, with the large amounts of RAM in modern computers, both vi and Emacs are relatively lightweight compared to large IDEs such as Eclipse, which tend to draw derision from both vi and Emacs users alike.
O'Reilly, a company which sells Vim and Emacs tutorials say the Vim one sells twice as many as Emacs. In a paint balling event, about twice as many people signed up for Vim than Emacs. This has been taken by some to suggest that around twice as many individuals prefer Vim over Emacs. However, it is noted that many advanced programmers use Emacs and its various offshoots, including Linus Torvalds who uses MicroEMACS.
In a Q&A session with nine prominent programmers, when asked what their favorite tools were, six of them mentioned Emacs.
In addition to vi and emacs workalikes, pico and its free software clone nano and other editors often have their own third-party advocates in the editor wars, though not to the extent of vi and emacs.
- Church of Emacs resources
- Rules, Sins, Virtues, Gods and more of The Church of Emacs
- Saint Ignucius — as portrayed by Richard Stallman
- Vi Lovers Home Page
- $EDITOR sucks-rules-o-meter measures which editor's activists are more visible on the Web
- Ed is the standard text editor
- A transcript of Richard introducing St. IGNUcias and the Church of Emacsde:Editorenkrieg
<ref>tags exist, but no
<references/>tag was found